Table of Contents
Environmental & Conservation Balance Sheet for The California Rice Industry
Table 4-2:
Summary of Offsite Rice Straw Uses
As Alternatives to Field Burning
Report of the Advisory Committee on Alternatives to Rice Straw Burning, December 29, 1995.
|
Alternatives/ Technology |
Technological Feasibility |
Economic Feasibility |
Commercial Feasibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Conversion | |||
| Anaerobic Digestion | Three-stage process requiring addition of manure. | Marginal, because of pre-treatment stages. | Technology still in concept stage; no pilot plants to date. |
| Direct Combustion | Not feasible because of slagging and high ash content. | Limited demand for biomass fuels; competitive market. | Not feasible. Commercial plants refuse rice straw because of technical difficulties. |
| Ethanol Production | Acid-hydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis methods; each provides efficient conversion resulting in relatively high product yields. | Market demand dependent on government subsidies. | Pilot plants proposed for North Valley locations. Ethanol fuel conversion could divert 40 percent of total rice straw volume annually. |
|
Alternatives/ Technology |
Technological Feasibility |
Economic Feasibility |
Commercial Feasibility |
| Pulp Products | |||
| Paper/Cardboard | Silica sludge produced during lignin removal is prohibitory with respect to cost and regulatory concerns; abrasive silica content of rice straw increases equipment and treatment costs significantly. | Highly competitive market represented by abundant raw materials with far superior processing qualities. | There are no known commercial rice straw plants in the United States. Feasiblity of manufacturing rice straw pulp products could improve if technology evolves to accomodate high silica content of rice straw. |
| Fiberboard | Silica sludge produced during lignin removal is prohibitory with respect to cost and regulatory concerns; abrasive silica content of rice straw increases equipment and treatment costs significantly. | Highly competitive market represented by abundant raw materials with far superior processing qualities. | NMC Corporation, a fiberboard plant using 21,000 tons of rice straw per year, is proposed for construction in Colusa County. The medium density fiberboard product would be used in furniture construction. |
| Composites | Silica sludge produced during lignin removal is prohibitory with respect to cost and regulatory concerns; abrasive silica content of rice straw increases equipment and treatment costs significantly. | Highly competitive market represented by abundant raw materials with far superior processing qualities. | A total of 30,000 to 100,000 tons of straw could be processed annually using the proprietary Particle Compacting Development (PACO) process to manufacture composite products such as pallets, sheeting, tiles, furniture, and irrigation piping. |
|
Alternatives/ Technology |
Technological Feasibility |
Economic Feasibility |
Commercial Feasibility |
| Construction Products | |||
| Bricks and Cement Boards | Agronomic Systems' process uses 70 pecent biomass (rice straw) and 30 percent recycled plastic to produce a wood replacement material (called BioComp) that can be shaped and nailed like wood, but is stronger, waterproof, and rot and insect resistant. | Production costs are expected to be approximately $0.52 per board foot; selling price will depend upon the market. | The pilot plant for BioComp has made a successful pilot run using rice straw from Sutter County. BioComp estimates that each plant will be able to produce up to 14,000 tons per year and service 3,000 to 5,000 acres of straw-producing land. |
| Panel Construction | Good. Seismic, thermal, and sound properties of the extruded panels are outstanding. | Dependent upon baling, transportation, and storage costs. | Several companies are currently using rice straw. PYRAMOD has a portable mfg. setup that could be driven to the harvesting site. One extrusion machine requires 10,000 tons of rice straw annually. |
| Bale Construction | Good. Finished structure is highly fire resistant and has exceptional insulation benefits. | Baling and transportation can cost $25 to $70 an acre. | Owner/builders who perform their own work can construct a building for $30/sq. ft. |
|
Alternatives/ Technology |
Technological Feasibility |
Economic Feasibility |
Commercial Feasibility |
| Soil Enhancement | |||
| Composting | Relatively high C:N ratio aids breakdown process. | Feasible. | Compost operations that use straw, process approx. 2,500 tons of straw annually. |
| Mushroom Production | Good as long as year-round supplies are available. | Feasible. | Mushroom growers would not have an incentive to switch from wheat to rice straw until price of rice straw comes down. |
|
Alternatives/ Technology |
Technological Feasibility |
Economic Feasibility |
Commercial Feasibility |
| Environmental Mitigation | |||
| Erosion Control | Good. Rice straw is heavier, more durable, and less likely to harbor noxious weeds. | Mechanisms for supplying the market (collection, transportation, storage) should be enhanced. | Demand is steady and not likely to decline. |
|
Alternatives/ Technology |
Technological Feasibility |
Economic Feasibility |
Commercial Feasibility |
| Livestock Feed | |||
| Cattle Fodder | Feasible for adult or pregnant livestock. | Must be supplemented. | Unknown. |






